WITHAM MP Priti Patel says there is "no point going over the past" after being criticised in former Prime Minister David Cameron's new autobiography.

Mr Cameron said attacks by Priti Patel, who is now the Home Secretary, on his Government's immigration record "shocked me most", but he did not want to fire her and create a "Brexit martyr".

He also says that Dominic Cummings, who is now a special adviser to the Government, was part of a "cauldron of toxicity" with Nigel Farage.

Ms Patel said there was "no point going over the past" when asked about Mr Cameron's memoirs during an interview on BBC One's Andrew Marr Show.

She said it was a "privilege" to serve in the former PM's Government, adding: "The referendum has happened, we've all moved on and the fact of the matter is we're now working to deliver that referendum mandate.

"That is so important. There is no point going over the past."

Mr Cameron also launched a stinging attack on Boris Johnson, claiming the Prime Minister "didn't believe" in Brexit and only backed the Leave campaign to further his career.

The Conservative former prime minister said Mr Johnson privately claimed there could be a "fresh renegotiation, followed by a second referendum" – which he now says he opposes.

In extracts of his long-awaited memoir, serialised in the Sunday Times, Mr Cameron also labelled Brexiteer Michael Gove, who was once a close friend, a "foam-flecked Faragist".

And he accused the leaders of the Leave campaign of declaring "open warfare" on him - and claimed they were guilty of "lying" to the public to win the 2016 referendum.

Mr Cameron wrote that the now-Prime Minister wanted to become the "darling of the party" and "didn't want to risk allowing someone else with a high profile - Michael Gove in particular - to win that crown".

"The conclusion I am left with is that he risked an outcome he didn't believe in because it would help his political career."

On Mr Gove, the former PM said: "One quality shone through: disloyalty. Disloyalty to me and, later, disloyalty to Boris."

And he said Mr Gove's claim that the public were tired of experts made him "an ambassador for the truth-twisting age of populism".

He said: "By the end, Boris and Michael seemed to me to be different people. Boris had backed something he didn't believe in.

"Michael had backed something he did perhaps believe in, but in the process had broken with his friends ... while taking up positions that were completely against his political identity.

"Both then behaved appallingly, attacking their own Government, turning a blind eye to their side's unpleasant actions and becoming ambassadors for the expert-trashing, truth-twisting age of populism."