Royals defend apartment spending

Braintree and Witham Times: Spending on a residence for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge has been defended by the Royal Family Spending on a residence for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge has been defended by the Royal Family

The Royal Family have defended spending a seven-figure sum refurbishing the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's Kensington Palace apartment.

The taxpayer will foot the bill for extensive work on the property, including installing a new roof, overhauling the electrics and carrying out significant plumbing works.

A royal spokesman said repairs and refurbishments - reported to cost in the region of £4 million, though this figure was not confirmed by the royal household - would also see a "significant amount of internal building" to "return the residence to function as a living space".

William and Kate's Kensington Palace apartment was designed by Sir Christopher Wren and was the home of Princess Margaret and Lord Snowdon. Margaret remained there after their divorce and lived there until her death in 2002.

The living space was last refurbished in 1963.

A royal spokesman said: "This is the Duke and Duchess's one and only official residence. It is here that they plan to stay for many, many years to come.

"We also had to take into account the fact that Kensington Palace is a scheduled ancient monument, and all elements of the refurbishment had to be agreed with English Heritage. Often this meant ensuring a high standard of work in line with the historical significance of the Christopher Wren building."

He said William and Kate "paid privately" for all the internal furnishings, including carpets and curtains. They were also at pains to ensure that the specification is not extravagant.

He added: "As with any other part of the estate, it was the royal household (TRH) who were responsible for the refurbishment of the residence - where they could in the course of the procurement process, TRH helped to bear down on cost.

"The household oversaw the planning, tendering and project management of the refurbishment and were responsible for the budget and spend."

Buckingham Palace also downplayed reports the Queen had taken on a new £8 million helicopter for the Cambridges' use.

A spokesman for the Queen said the monarch had "secured an annual lease" for a helicopter, for a fixed number of hours.

The spokesman said the helicopter would be used by members of the Royal Family - not exclusively William, a qualified pilot having undertaken training with the RAF, and Kate - and that the lease represented good value for money.

He said: "It will provide an alternative to chartering a number of different helicopters."

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:47pm Sat 21 Jun 14

bradfordian says...

There is no problem provided they are paying for it out of their own finances.
There is no problem provided they are paying for it out of their own finances. bradfordian
  • Score: 3

4:17pm Sat 21 Jun 14

Sir Ad E Noid says...

bradfordian wrote:
There is no problem provided they are paying for it out of their own finances.
Kensington Palace belongs to the Crown Estate. Therefore it belongs to you and me. It has not been refurbished since at least 1963. The building is quite old and If you want your property to last, it needs maintenance. We are paying a higher cost because, due to cutbacks, recent maintenance has been skipped. If you were providing a service for this country and given a house to live in, yes a grand one, would you pay for its refurbishment? I think not.
[quote][p][bold]bradfordian[/bold] wrote: There is no problem provided they are paying for it out of their own finances.[/p][/quote]Kensington Palace belongs to the Crown Estate. Therefore it belongs to you and me. It has not been refurbished since at least 1963. The building is quite old and If you want your property to last, it needs maintenance. We are paying a higher cost because, due to cutbacks, recent maintenance has been skipped. If you were providing a service for this country and given a house to live in, yes a grand one, would you pay for its refurbishment? I think not. Sir Ad E Noid
  • Score: -6

7:08pm Sat 21 Jun 14

Dilligaf2010 says...

They should pay for the work themselves, we won't benefit from the work, so why should we pay for it?
They should pay for the work themselves, we won't benefit from the work, so why should we pay for it? Dilligaf2010
  • Score: 7

8:01pm Sat 21 Jun 14

ekcoanarak says...

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
They should pay for the work themselves, we won't benefit from the work, so why should we pay for it?
Absolutely correct.Parasites.
[quote][p][bold]Dilligaf2010[/bold] wrote: They should pay for the work themselves, we won't benefit from the work, so why should we pay for it?[/p][/quote]Absolutely correct.Parasites. ekcoanarak
  • Score: 6

12:11am Sun 22 Jun 14

mixxer says...

How much cancer treatment would that £4million have paid for? Not a question to enter the thick skulls of these parasites. Scum!
How much cancer treatment would that £4million have paid for? Not a question to enter the thick skulls of these parasites. Scum! mixxer
  • Score: 1

7:42pm Sun 22 Jun 14

cj07589 says...

I thought there was a benefit cap in place?
I thought there was a benefit cap in place? cj07589
  • Score: 0

8:50pm Sun 22 Jun 14

cj07589 says...

mixxer wrote:
How much cancer treatment would that £4million have paid for? Not a question to enter the thick skulls of these parasites. Scum!
Well they are taking all for a ride no better than benefit cheats in my opinion. Time to consider the word beginning with "R" and ending in "c"
[quote][p][bold]mixxer[/bold] wrote: How much cancer treatment would that £4million have paid for? Not a question to enter the thick skulls of these parasites. Scum![/p][/quote]Well they are taking all for a ride no better than benefit cheats in my opinion. Time to consider the word beginning with "R" and ending in "c" cj07589
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree