Botched Southend Hospital surgery lead to death of Canvey man

Southend Hospital

Southend Hospital

First published in South Essex news Exclusive by

A MAN died of multiple organ failure after a surgeon burnt a hole in his bladder during an operation, an inquest heard.

George Bastick, 84, from Kings Caravan Park, Canvey, was sewn up with the injury untreated, after the surgeon failed to spot the blunder.

Mr Bastick suffered a major internal infection in the 48-hours between the operation and a second one to remove a swab left inside him and died the following day.

He had been admitted to Southend Hospital with abdominal pains, later discovered to have been caused by gall stones.

Chelmsford Coroner’s Court heard locum consultant Robert Buhain carried out keyhole surgery on him on January 31, 2013, but had difficulties removing the gallbladder which appeared to be shrunken.

He changed toamore standard open surgery and was easily able to remove the organ, but ran into further difficulties.

He said: “After I removed it I noticed a lot of bleeding coming from underneath the liver. I controlled the bleeding and asked a senior surgeon to come and assist.”

The more senior consultant took charge and the bleeding was located from an artery that had to be tied off.

It was decided to pack the area with a swab for at least 24 hours to prevent further bleeding and this was sewn inside Mr Bastick.

He was then sent to the high dependency unit to recover, ahead of a further operation to remove the swab 48 hours later.

This was due on February 1, but did not happen due to higher-risk patients needing operations.

On February 2 the removal began.

Mr Buhain said: “When the incision was opened and the pack removed there was a lot of fluid that looked and smelled infected. That prompted me to look for the source of the fluid, and I found a hole in the bladder.”

He said the most likely cause was a laser during the initial keyhole surgery that caused a small burn which was not picked up.

The hole, less than 1cm wide, was treated, but Mr Bastick developed a high pulse and low blood pressure.

Despite being moved into intensive care he died on February 3.

A post-mortem examinationby pathologist Dr Ian Calder gave the cause of death as multi-organ failure caused by infection after the perforation caused during surgery.

Braintree and Witham Times:

Organ failure: Dr Ian Calder

A barrister representing Mr Bastick’s family suggested he was too confused to consent to the operation.

The court heard Mr Bastick gave consent to consultant Robert Buhain and another medic.

But David Manknell, for the family, said Mr Bastick had no family members with him and had been admitted complaining of confusion and hallucinations.

Mr Buhain denied recommending the operation, but told Mr Bastick most consultants would.

Mr Manknell also suggested at 84 years old Mr Bastick would have been unfit for the surgery, but Mr Buhain maintained he would carry out the procedure on a similar patient even after the tragedy.

Mr Manknell added: “Before you sewed up and left for that day, what checks did you do to make sure there was not a perforated bowl?”

Mr Buhain said: “Looking back over this again I cannot for the life of me say when exactly what happened because I was completely unaware of the perforation.”

However, he insisted it was checked and nothing was seen.

Braintree and Witham Times:

Questions: David Manknell

Mr Manknell asked him if the swab had been removed earlier was there are increased chance of survival.

Mr Buhain accepted there was, but maintained observations on Mr Bastick had picked up no sign of infection.

The court heard Mr Buhain had carried out 200 similar procedures over ten years with no similar incidents.

Coroner Eleanor McGann recorded a narrative verdict.

She said: “Mr Bastick underwent an operation to remove his gallbladder.

This started as keyhole surgery, which was converted to an open procedure due to difficulties encountered during the keyhole surgery.

“Duodenal perforation occurred which was not spotted at the time. During a further routine operation, the perforation was seen and repaired, but it was too late to prevent infection.

“The perforation led to organising peritonitis and on February 3, 2013, Mr Bastick died from multiorgan failure.”

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:08am Thu 4 Sep 14

Maya Pinnion says...

Do you know the difference between bowl and bowel? And come to think of it the difference between bowel and bladder?
RIP sir
Do you know the difference between bowl and bowel? And come to think of it the difference between bowel and bladder? RIP sir Maya Pinnion
  • Score: 4

11:35am Thu 4 Sep 14

Russ13 says...

It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame.

From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon.

The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery.

I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.
It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame. From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon. The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery. I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen. Russ13
  • Score: -6

11:37am Thu 4 Sep 14

Russ13 says...

It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame.

From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon.

The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery.

I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.
It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame. From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon. The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery. I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen. Russ13
  • Score: -2

5:19pm Thu 4 Sep 14

CHRISTMAS CAROL says...

Russ13 wrote:
It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame.

From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon.

The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery.

I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.
YES , THERE IS SOMEBODY TO BLAME THE ARROGANT TOTALLY INCOMPETENT MR BUHAIN.
WHO ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE LOOPY LOCUMS FAMILY.YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LOAD OF TRIPE
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame. From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon. The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery. I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.[/p][/quote]YES , THERE IS SOMEBODY TO BLAME THE ARROGANT TOTALLY INCOMPETENT MR BUHAIN. WHO ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE LOOPY LOCUMS FAMILY.YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LOAD OF TRIPE CHRISTMAS CAROL
  • Score: -2

9:32am Fri 5 Sep 14

n-unknown says...

Russ13 wrote:
It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame.

From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon.

The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery.

I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.
In this instance, because the cause of infection was as a result of the surgeon making a small hole in the patients bowel without realising, then there is someone to blame.

The risks and the worst case scenarios are all based upon on the individual's chances of survival before, during and after the operation WITHOUT any consideration of human error, simply because there is a zero tolerance for mistakes or for negligence.
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame. From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon. The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery. I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.[/p][/quote]In this instance, because the cause of infection was as a result of the surgeon making a small hole in the patients bowel without realising, then there is someone to blame. The risks and the worst case scenarios are all based upon on the individual's chances of survival before, during and after the operation WITHOUT any consideration of human error, simply because there is a zero tolerance for mistakes or for negligence. n-unknown
  • Score: 0

9:32am Fri 5 Sep 14

n-unknown says...

Russ13 wrote:
It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame.

From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon.

The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery.

I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.
In this instance, because the cause of infection was as a result of the surgeon making a small hole in the patients bowel without realising, then there is someone to blame.

The risks and the worst case scenarios are all based upon on the individual's chances of survival before, during and after the operation WITHOUT any consideration of human error, simply because there is a zero tolerance for mistakes or for negligence.
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: It's very unfortunate when things go wrong in surgery but sadly it does happen and there's not necessarily anyone to blame. From the above account it would seem the surgeon in question followed procedures and got back up when required from a more senior surgeon. The comment about the deceased gentleman not being able to give consent due to his mental state as the family say none of them were there with him at the time and that he was confused....... I'm sure if he'd been left to suffer in pain whilst they waited for a family member to arrive there would have been complaints about the delay in getting the patient into surgery. I can understand relatives being upset over Mr Bastick's death but like most things in life, there are often risks associated and sometimes the worst case scenario does happen.[/p][/quote]In this instance, because the cause of infection was as a result of the surgeon making a small hole in the patients bowel without realising, then there is someone to blame. The risks and the worst case scenarios are all based upon on the individual's chances of survival before, during and after the operation WITHOUT any consideration of human error, simply because there is a zero tolerance for mistakes or for negligence. n-unknown
  • Score: 0

9:33am Fri 5 Sep 14

n-unknown says...

Bladder*
Bladder* n-unknown
  • Score: -1
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree