Jailed peer wants to reform prisons (From Braintree and Witham Times)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting BWT to 80360 or you can email us »
Jailed peer wants to reform prisons
8:00am Saturday 4th August 2012 in News By Adam Cornell
Lord Hanningfield
DISGRACED peer Lord Hanningfield has revealed he is looking to use his prison experience to help others.
The former Tory leader of Essex County Council , who served a quarter of a nine-month sentence for fiddling his House of Lords expenses, says he has now returned to his Parliamentary work. He has advertised for a researcher to help him with his reform campaign. Lord Hanningfield – real name Paul White – wants the staffer to help him work on a plan for prison reform and mental health improvements from October.
He said: “The whole idea of prison reform is to stop reoffending and to give young people a chance before we get a new generation in prison.
“I saw how the young children suffer and how prison visitor rooms are like playschool.
“The young people themselves are not getting the help for the future they need and a lot more needs to be done.”
Lord Hanningfield claimed nearly £14,000 for overnight stays in London and journeys he never made or someone else paid for. On one occasion, he was on a plane to India.
He suggested he may not have been jailed were it not for the public and media furore surrounding the expenses scandal.
He claims his age, 71, gives him a unique perspective, coupled with 40 years of public service. He still struggles to come to terms with his imprisonment.
He added: “I was in for a short time. Other people wouldn’t have been jailed for £13,000 of parliamentary expenses, but it was all hyped up by the media.
“But having had the experience, I know there needs to be reform and improvement in the education offered in prison to people, some of whom can’t read or write.”
Lord Hanningfield is also hoping to increase people’s understanding of mental health issues. He said: “I have been through acute depression myself and had to have treatment for it.
“A lot of people are in prison with mental problems and a lot were involved in crime because of the same mental problems.
“For me, it was more traumatic before I was in prison because of the publicity, but I have learnt from it and want to use the experience to help others now.”
Colchester MP Sir Bob Russell scoffed at Lord Hanningfield’s claim that he was in the ideal position to change things.
He said: “All of us learn from life experiences, but I think most people take the view he should no longer be helping to formulate the laws of the land by being a member of the House of Lords.”
Comments(13)
wellnow
says...
10:01am Sat 4 Aug 12
ShallowRemarks
says...
10:56am Sat 4 Aug 12
jacko23
says...
11:35am Sat 4 Aug 12
But still a thief is a thief for whatever reason they do it sometimes has to be understood.
Checkout
says...
11:51am Sat 4 Aug 12
Sdapeze
says...
12:47pm Sat 4 Aug 12
jut1972
says...
4:09pm Sat 4 Aug 12
terry 999
says...
6:07pm Sat 4 Aug 12
brain1
says...
10:45pm Sat 4 Aug 12
terry 999 wrote:Any one likes to take a bet they will be conveniently brushed under the carpet.
What happened about the charges involving expences while he was in charge at Essex County Council.
All I can say is Paul White never got the punishment he deserves.
How did he get parole if he never admitted his crimes?
Sdapeze
says...
9:50pm Sun 5 Aug 12
brain1
says...
10:34pm Sun 5 Aug 12
I ask again how did he get parole if he did not admit to his crimes.
newtactic
says...
12:37pm Fri 10 Aug 12
totallyfootball
says...
3:39pm Fri 10 Aug 12
Say It As It Is OK? says...
8:54am Sat 4 Aug 12
Perhaps he's right because most MPs, who claimed expenses not due to them, should also have been locked away rather than make excuses and pay it back...but they did so only after they were caught fiddling.
It makes no difference to the sum of money fiddled (A Thief is a Thief!) and the expenses scandal showed these so called public figures up to be thieves and scroungers.
As for Bob, hope he has learned from his life experiences and I agree with his comment that nobody, MP or Peer should be helping to formulate the laws of the land if they were fiddling their expenses.
Doubt if we will see any resignations though!