Pensioners to stage protest over hospital 'scandal'

Braintree and Witham Times: Pensioners to stage protest over hospital 'scandal' Pensioners to stage protest over hospital 'scandal'

Irate pensioners are sending out a call to arms as they plan a protest over the alleged “scandal” at Braintree Community Hospital.

The radical decision by members of Braintree Pensioners Action Group comes after Serco, which has managed the hospital in Chadwick Drive since 2011, last month*DEC* revealed its intention to cut short its contract with Mid Essex Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) by three months, to December 2014.

Serco claimed referral levels had not improved as hoped, while Chris Green, chairman of the Friends of Braintree Community Hospital, said there simply weren’t enough patients coming through the door and questioned whether the trend could be reversed.

But since then, a number of residents have come forward to claim health bosses have referred them elsewhere, despite their treatment or procedures supposedly being available in Braintree.

Braintree Pensioners Action Group member Don Challen, who is orchestrating the protest, said: "This is a community hospital for the people of Braintree.

“It was set up for the people of this town, which is expanding, and we need it and need someone to run it effectively.

“It’s really a case of do people in this town want their hospital? If they do, they’ve got to do something about it.”

A spokesman for the Mid Essex Clinical Commissioning Group said: “The CCG’s priority is to ensure that patients can still access effective services at Braintree Community Hospital.

“Following Serco's decision to exit its contract early, the CCG is exploring how it can work closely with Serco to ensure minimum disruption to patients.”

He added: “The process by which patients choose where to receive healthcare procedures remains the same.

“Patients are referred by their GP to a Central Referral Service (CRS), which offers patients all the treatment and procedure options available to them; it is then for the patient to decide."

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:37pm Sun 19 Jan 14

OMPITA [Intl] says...

Are SERCO in breach of contract by taking this action?

If so are they liable for damages?

I do not lay claim to any significant level of expertise in contractual matters, but even with my very limited experience I must say that I find it extremely weird to see that ‘Hope’ seems to feature as some sort of condition or term (Quote: ‘Serco claimed referral levels had not improved as hoped’).

“Things aren’t going as well as we hoped - so let’s renege on the agreement”. Is that what they are saying?

What’s going on?
Are SERCO in breach of contract by taking this action? If so are they liable for damages? I do not lay claim to any significant level of expertise in contractual matters, but even with my very limited experience I must say that I find it extremely weird to see that ‘Hope’ seems to feature as some sort of condition or term (Quote: ‘Serco claimed referral levels had not improved as hoped’). “Things aren’t going as well as we hoped - so let’s renege on the agreement”. Is that what they are saying? What’s going on? OMPITA [Intl]

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree