Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting BWT to 80360 or you can email us Click here for details »
11:49am Wednesday 14th May 2008
CLAIMS that a county council has made a U-turn on its no-incineration policy have been strongly denied by the authority's leader.
Green Party member James Abbott, district councillor for Rivenhall, believes an environmental report commissioned by Essex County Council to accompany its Draft Waste Strategy confirms that the authority is planning a waste incinerator for the county.
Mr Abbott is concerned it could be built at Rivenhall Airfield because it is used as an example site for a solid recovered fuel plant (SRF) in the council's outline business case for private finance initiative cash.
He said: "It confirms what Essex Green Party has been saying all along - that the energy plant' is in fact a waste incinerator and that a plant of the size being suggested by the county council would typically cover 6,600 sq metres and have a chimney stack 70m high.
"The plant being suggested by the county council is also discussed in its PFI outline business case bid to burn 255,000 tonnes of municipal waste a year."
But council leader Lord Hanningfield said: "The county council's position has not changed; there will be no mass burn incineration in Essex.
"This is just pure political scaremongering by Cllr Abbott.
"We are exploring the option of PFI credits because of government requirements, and this is not an indication that it will be the final option for financing or an indeed of any site location.
"The only thing that is fact is the planning permission has been granted at Rivenhall for an anaerobic digester plant, for any kind of energy from waste plant to be built the full and proper planning processes would need to be gone through.
Cllr. James Abbott, Rivenhall says...
11:50pm Wed 21 May 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Braintree and Witham Times account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
| July 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 |
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for hundreds of jobs in Essex and beyond
Search Now »
Bring love into your life! Find a date in Essex
Search Now »
Homes for sale, and to let, in Essex
Search Now »
New and used cars in Essex and across the UK
Search Now »
Cllr Michael Lager, Witham says...
11:14am Thu 15 May 08
If any such plant is eventually built on the Rivenhall airfield site, which is a long way from the nearest settlements, I am quite determined it will conform to the highest standards of design, construction and operation including the strictest cleaning of any emissions before release of anything into the atmosphere. I don't know where this story about a 200 ft chimney has come from as it's the first I've heard of it. What does concern people however is the access and added traffic particularly through Bradwell. When the present government gets round to making up its mind about the A120 link with the A12, and if Rivenhall gets the go ahead, I would like to see an access from the A120 near the site.
It's hard to understand what the Green lobby would like to see instead of the County Council's approach, which seeks to reduce refuse at source, to sort out recyclables at the earliest point, and then to process the remainder into useable residues including a high-energy solid fuel.
The Green lobby seems without a policy except to oppose, and as far as I can gather favours local disposal, for which the only technology is dumping in fast-vanishing landfill sites (where harmful methane escapes into the atmosphere) or the mass incineration they wrongly accuse the County Council of pursuing.
Let's have a debate but let's have an honest one.